Switched from Ant to Maven. Usage: - Install Maven 3.x - Enter directory with pom.xml - Type mvn compile - Enjoy!
		
			
				
	
	
		
			41 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			41 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
	
	
| <html>
 | |
| <head>
 | |
| <title>Particle Swarm Optimization - PSO</title>
 | |
| </head>
 | |
| <body>
 | |
| <h1 align="center">Particle Swarm Optimization - PSO</h1>
 | |
| <center>
 | |
| </center><br>
 | |
| The Particle Swarm Optimization by Kennedy and Eberhardt is inspired by swarm intelligent
 | |
| behaviour seen in animals like birds or ants. A swarm of particles is a set of individual agents
 | |
| "flying" across the search space with individual velocity vectors. There is no selection as in
 | |
| classic Evolutionary Algorithms. Instead, the individuals exchange knowledge about the space they
 | |
| have come across. Each one is attracted to the best position the individual has seen so far (cognitive 
 | |
| component) and to the best position known by its neighbors (social component).
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| The neighborhood is defined by the swarm velocity, which may be a linear ordering, a grid and some others.
 | |
| The influence of the velocity of the last time-step is taken into account using an inertness/
 | |
| constriction parameter, which controls the convergence behaviour of the swarm.
 | |
| </p>
 | |
| The influence of social and cognitive attraction are weighed using the <i>phi</i> parameters. In the
 | |
| constriction variant there is a dependence enforced between constriction and the phi, making sure that
 | |
| the swarm converges slowly but steadily, see the publications of M.Clerc, e.g.
 | |
| Typical values for the attractor weights are phi1=phi2=2.05.
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| The topology defines the communication structure of the swarm. In linear topology, each particle has contact
 | |
| to n others in two directions, so there is a linear overlay structure. The grid topology connects a particle
 | |
| in 4 directions, while the star variant is completely connected. The random variant just connects each
 | |
| particle to k others by random and anew in every generation cycle.
 | |
| Basically, the more connections are available, the quicker will information about good areas spread through
 | |
| the swarm and lead to quicker convergence, thereby increasing the risk of converging prematurely.
 | |
| By default, the random (e.g. with range=4) or grid structure (e.g. with range=2) are good choices.
 | |
| </p>
 | |
| <p> 
 | |
| The multi-swarm approach splits the main swarm in sub-swarms defined by the distance to a local "leader", 
 | |
| as in the dynamic multi-swarm approaches by Shi and Branke, for example. The tree structure orders the
 | |
| swarm to a tree of degree k, where the fittest individuals are on top and inform all their children nodes.
 | |
| In this case, the higher the degree, the quicker will information spread. HPSO is a hierarchical tree variant
 | |
| by Janson and Middendorf, 2005. 
 | |
| 
 | |
| </body>
 | |
| </html> |